The Utility of Drug Repurposing in Orphan Disease Research
By: Michael F Murphy, MD, PhD, Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, Worldwide Clinical Trials
Erin Griner, PhD, Associate Director, Clinical Research Methodology, Worldwide Clinical Trials
Matthew Confeld, PharmD, PhD, Assistant Director, Clinical Research Methodology, Worldwide Clinical Trials
The Utility of Drug Repurposing in Orphan Disease Research
By: Michael F Murphy, MD, PhD, Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, Worldwide Clinical Trials
Erin Griner, PhD, Associate Director, Clinical Research Methodology, Worldwide Clinical Trials
Matthew Confeld, PharmD, PhD, Assistant Director, Clinical Research Methodology, Worldwide Clinical Trials
Drug repurposing (or repositioning) offers an alternative path by which drugs can be brought to market — in significantly less time and at significantly lower cost and risk.
It can take 15 to 20 (or more) years for a novel drug to reach the market, and few of the candidates that start down that path actually complete the journey. Drug repurposing (or repositioning) offers an alternative path by which drugs can be brought to market — in significantly less time and at significantly lower cost and risk. The approach targets a new indication for a medication with an already well-defined application, and the work required to prove the safety and efficacy of the drug for the new target indication can build on the broad foundation of clinical and nonclinical data that has already been collected about the drug. For orphan diseases in particular, a repurposing strategy can reduce the cost and complexity of drug development, addressing critical unmet needs faster and more effectively than a traditional de novo approach.
Drug Repurposing: Shortcutting the Long Path to Success
Drug repurposing involves truncating the discovery pathway and effectively reducing a lengthy and costly path through drug discovery to reach a clinically viable candidate. Drug repurposing (or repositioning) identifies a new indication for an approved medication with a well-defined application already on the market.
While the risk of failure due to inadequate efficacy still depends on how well the predictions from nonclinical paradigms or anecdotal clinical observations will translate into positive clinical findings in controlled settings, the safety of a repurposed drug has already been suggested.
Utility within the new indication might require the re-estimation of safe and effective exposures under a different dosing regimen or for use in a population not previously studied and for which requisite nonclinical data do not exist. A repurposed candidate may encounter relatively unencumbered regulatory interactions, given the repository of available information. These data also contribute to a “de-risking” of investment decisions, as those variables that predominantly dictate failure within the clinic can be appropriately described and accommodated.
There are also ethical concerns to be taken into consideration. The repurposing of compounds that have already achieved NDA and market authorization for one indication may permit the use of existing patient data to inform utility in another — an important consideration when the repurposed drug is now targeting an orphan disease with a severely limited population.
Approaches to Drug Repurposing
Three distinct approaches (see Figure 2) have been used to propose new indications for known drugs:
- Experimental approaches will use in vitro or in vivo animal paradigms to establish a novel bioactivity of a known drug potentially relevant to a new indication. This can be accomplished through phenotypic in vivo screening, such as Zebra fish or C. elegans. The screening can also be carried out in in vitro target-based biochemical assays. Both in vitro and in vivo screening can lead to the discovery of novel targets, eventual target validation, or perhaps novel pathways related to a particular pathophysiology, with differences in the identification of successful candidates notable between phenotypic and target-based drug discovery efforts.2,3 While the selection of assays and compounds to screen could be done in a completely unbiased manner, a systematic search of biomedical literature and accessible data may be a more efficient way to discover possible targets for evaluation.
- Clinical approaches are based on the analysis of adverse effects or symptom improvements observed either during the clinical trial or during post-marketed use of the drug. These approaches are typically based on serendipitous discoveries of benefits that are tangential to the originally expected benefits.4 In some cases, the repurposing efforts arise in the aftermath of a failed Phase III trial. Sildenafil, for example, was originally intended to treat hypertension and angina pectoris but demonstrated a lack of efficacy in clinical trials. An analysis of its side effects, however, prompted developers to repurpose the drug to address erectile dysfunction.5,6 Similarly, thalidomide, tragically marketed as a sedative in the 1950s, would prove unexpectedly effective at treating erythema nodosum leprosum and multiple myeloma.7,8
- Computational or in silico approaches take advantage of the amount of biomedical data, its accessibility, and high-performance informatics techniques to curate and analyze this data at an unprecedented level. Automated text search methods can digest terabytes of publicly available biomedical literature to identify high-confidence relationships between drugs, targets, biochemical pathways, and human disease. Omics research can plow through genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics data, including protein structure databases, to look for relationships and similarities between biological targets or pathways. Molecular modeling methods make it possible to go beyond a drug molecule and to explore similar bioactive molecules, targets, and pathways related to them that point to novel indications.
These computational methods enable developers to analyze the largest set of potential targets and pathways, truly enabling “indication hopping,” as it has been described. The main challenge in employing these methods lies in staying focused and properly prioritizing the most promising leads. The proof of a rising interest in in silico drug repurposing is a growing number of start-up tech companies that explicitly focus on developing and fully exploiting in silico approaches to drive the discovery of new indications for known drugs.
Challenges to be Considered
None of this is to say that a repurposing effort is without challenges. A developer may have a compelling idea about repurposing an existing drug to fulfill an unmet need in another indication, but if that developer does not own the rights to the drug (even if the drug never made it to the market), it may be unable to exploit the compound’s actual suitability for that indication. Issues having to do with intellectual property negotiations, out-licensing, or other financial or contractual arrangements are beyond the scope of this paper, but they can quickly complicate a repurposing effort, otherwise mitigating what would be an attractive and occasionally compelling scientific rationale. Programs such as the NIH’s NCATS repurposing program can facilitate negotiations by acting as a trusted intermediary.5
Even if there are no encumbrances based on asset ownership, there could be limitations based on staffing. If a drug is to be repurposed towards an entirely new indication, it is important for the developer to assess its in-house expertise in that indication, both in discovery as well as the eventual development. If expertise in the new indication is well outside the scope of in-house staff expertise, the developer will need to determine how best to gain access to the expertise and experience needed to shepherd development through the phases that need to be completed.5,4 That may involve the engagement of external subject matter experts and clinical trial specialists, or it may lead to a decision to out-license the asset to another developer that already has demonstrable capabilities in the indication.9
Finally, the new target indication itself may bring new, unanticipated requirements to the development effort. Limitations frequently involve a potential lack of supporting nonclinical data and requirements that could arise within the regulatory review process. Common examples can be cited by repurposing efforts within the oncology space, where compounds with a known mechanism of action, even for a commercially available agent, appear intuitively attractive for a non-oncological indication, but the requisite IND-enabling data does not provide a safety margin or duration of exposure compatible with the new targeted indication under ICH conventions.
In closing, as a development strategy, a drug repurposing effort can be particularly useful for development in the orphan disease space. The opportunity to consider available chemical and biological entities that have already been commercialized provides an excellent framework for innovative, efficient clinical development.
References
1. Dhir N, Jain A, Mahendru D, Prakash A, Medhi B. Drug Repurposing and Orphan Disease Therapeutics. In: Farid AB, ed. Drug Repurposing. IntechOpen; 2020:Ch. 4.
2. Moffat JG, Vincent F, Lee JA, Eder J, Prunotto M. Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discov. Aug 2017;16(8):531-543. doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.111
3. Zheng W, Thorne N, McKew JC. Phenotypic screens as a renewed approach for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. Nov 2013;18(21-22):1067-73. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2013.07.001
4. Novac N. Challenges and opportunities of drug repositioning. Trends Pharmacol Sci. May 2013;34(5):267-72. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2013.03.004
5. Cavalla D. Predictive methods in drug repurposing: gold mine or just a bigger haystack? Drug Discov Today. Jun 2013;18(11-12):523-32. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2012.12.009
6. Viagra: How a Little Blue Pill Changed the World. 2023. https://www.drugs.com/slideshow/viagra-little-blue-pill-1043
7. Pillaiyar T, Meenakshisundaram S, Manickam M, Sankaranarayanan M. A medicinal chemistry perspective of drug repositioning: Recent advances and challenges in drug discovery. Eur J Med Chem. Jun 1 2020;195:112275. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112275
8. Bennett C. History of Thalidomide. 2023. https://www.news-medical.net/health/History-of-Thalidomide.aspx
9. Murphy MF, Klicic Badoux J. Facilitating Investment Decisions for Small to Midsize Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Companies. 2023. https://www.worldwide.com/news-views/early-phase-financing-facilitating-investment-decisions/
ABOUT Michael F Murphy, MD, PhD
Dr. Murphy is Chief Medical & Scientific Officer and an original founder of Worldwide Clinical Trials, a full-service, therapeutically focused, clinical research organization active in over 60 countries with dedicated services in central and peripheral nervous system disorders, cardiometabolic disorders, immune mediated inflammatory disorders, oncology, and orphan products. He is a Founder and Research & Development Editor for American Health & Drug Benefits™, and for over two decades has been a lecturer within the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences Technology on clinical trial methodology for board-certified/board eligible Research Fellows. He is recipient of the Clinical Research & Excellence (CARE) Lifetime Achievement Award. PharmaVoice selected him as one the 100 Most Inspiring People in the life-sciences industry.
ABOUT Erin Griner, PhD
Erin Griner, PhD, serves as the Associate Director of Clinical Research Methodology within Worldwide where she provides assistance with study design, strategic program design, and regulatory interactions across indications and clinical phases. She earned her PhD in Pharmacology from the University of Pennsylvania. Prior to joining Worldwide, she worked in academia performing scientific research in cell signaling, tumorigenesis and metastasis, behavioral neuroscience, and circadian biology.
ABOUT Matthew Confeld, PharmD, PhD
Matthew has 10+ years of experience in pharmaceutical science. His experience spans preclinical drug development of environment responsive nanoparticles for various solid tumor indications, serves as a translational advisor to a National Institute of Health center of biologic research in pancreatic cancer, and has extensive experience in pharmacy including clinical pharmacogenomics for a large healthcare system and specialty pharmacy management. He provides consulting-like services to sponsors across phases of development from preclinical through NDA.